AI Learning System · Evaluation

Your Feedback Matters

Help us improve by sharing your experience — system quality and Kirkpatrick four-level learning impact.

🐛 Bug Report
⭐ L1 Reaction
📘 L2 Learning
🔄 L3 Behavior
📈 L4 Results
Section 1 of 5 20%
👤

Respondent Information

Optional — helps us follow up if needed

Optional
🚦

Did you encounter any issues?

Select all that apply — or skip if everything worked fine

📄

Content Issue

Errors in learning materials, assessments, or AI explanations

Content
0 words
🖥️

Interface / UI Issue

Layout, navigation, accessibility, or interaction problems

Interface
    📎
    Click to attach (PNG, JPG, GIF, MP4 — max 10 MB)
    🌐

    Translation Issue

    Missing, inaccurate, or inconsistent translations in non-English content

    i18n
    💬

    Additional Notes

    Anything else the team should know about issues encountered

    0 words
    Kirkpatrick Level 1 — Reaction · Measures learner satisfaction, engagement, and perceived relevance immediately after the learning experience. (Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2006)
    ⭐

    Overall Satisfaction

    1 (very poor) → 5 (excellent) — click a star

    Level 1
    Overall experience
    Quality of content
    Ease of use (interface)
    AI tutor / virtual human quality
    Pacing & time efficiency
    🎯

    Engagement & Relevance

    1 = Strongly Disagree · 5 = Strongly Agree

    The learning activities kept me engaged throughout.
    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
    The content was relevant to my goals / course requirements.
    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
    I would recommend this system to peers or colleagues.
    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
    The adaptive AI feedback was helpful and timely.
    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
    📣

    Net Promoter Score

    How likely are you to recommend this system to a colleague or friend?

    Not at all likelyExtremely likely
    ✍️

    Open Reflection

    Your qualitative impressions

    0 words
    0 words
    Kirkpatrick Level 2 — Learning · Assesses changes in knowledge, skills, attitudes, confidence, and commitment. Self-report proxy; complements pre/post assessments in the LRS.
    🧠

    Knowledge & Skill Gain

    1 = No change · 5 = Substantial gain

    Level 2
    I can explain the core concepts covered in this session.
    Cannot explainFully confident
    My skill level has measurably improved compared to before this session.
    No changeMajor improvement
    I am confident I could apply what I learned without looking it up.
    Not confidentVery confident
    The AI-generated explanations and feedback accelerated my understanding.
    Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
    I now hold a more nuanced or corrected understanding of the topic.
    No attitude shiftSignificant shift
    ✍️

    Reflection on Learning

    0 words
    0 words
    0 words
    Kirkpatrick Level 3 — Behavior · Measures observable transfer of learning to real-world contexts. Items focus on application intent if this is an immediate post-session survey.
    🔄

    Transfer of Learning

    1 = Strongly Disagree · 5 = Strongly Agree

    Level 3
    I have already applied or plan to apply what I learned to a real task or project.
    No applicationAlready applied
    My approach to solving related problems has changed as a result of this learning.
    No changeMajor change
    I have shared or discussed what I learned with others (classmates, colleagues).
    Not at allExtensively
    My supervisor / instructor / mentor has noticed improvement in my performance.
    N/A / NoYes, definitely
    🚧

    Transfer Barriers & Support

    What prevents you from applying what you learned?

    0 words
    0 words
    Kirkpatrick Level 4 — Results · Evaluates the degree to which targeted outcomes occurred as a result of learning. Hardest level to attribute causally; items focus on self-perceived organisational and systemic impact.
    📈

    Perceived Outcomes

    1 = No impact · 5 = Significant positive impact

    Level 4
    My academic / professional performance has improved due to this learning.
    No impactMajor improvement
    The quality of my work outputs has increased since using this system.
    No changeSignificantly better
    I completed relevant goals or assignments more effectively because of this learning.
    No effectStrongly agree
    The system has contributed to my team's or institution's goals.
    Not at allVery much so
    🎯

    Measurable Evidence of Impact

    Hardest to attribute — most valuable for ROI evaluation

    0 words
    0 words
    🔭

    Forward-Looking & Strategic Value

    0 words
    0 words
    ✓

    Thank you for your feedback

    Your responses help us continuously improve the AI Learning System. The research team will review your input promptly.

    💡 Help

    Getting help…